Thanks in advance.
Lee [/b]

pwf46 wrote:Have no idea on the #18, but I believe the #7 could be Lenny Seroka.
thanks Ron...crzee_27 wrote:Just searched and found the Tasney car, http://www.thevintageracer.com/westpa/cubic003.htm . Lee's pic looks like a Seroka built frame much like the one he built and drove for my dad.
remember the good old days, when you could but chemicals on the track.sprintwrench46 wrote:No dust in that shot, even in daylight conditions, wow!!!
LEE GREENAWALT wrote:remember the good old days, when you could but chemicals on the track.sprintwrench46 wrote:No dust in that shot, even in daylight conditions, wow!!!
NO TREE HUGGERS!
Ron, I know, we can thank WoO for the track changes over the years.crzee_27 wrote:LEE GREENAWALT wrote:remember the good old days, when you could but chemicals on the track.sprintwrench46 wrote:No dust in that shot, even in daylight conditions, wow!!!
NO TREE HUGGERS!
Lee,its not just the lack of calcium,etc.. that has today's track surfaces dryer than those of the past. The lightweight components on today's cars wouldn't last long on tracks like in your photo. The WoO screamed everytime they came east and found a wet rough track, so now we have hard-pack smooth dirt tracks with steamroller tires and even the local racers don't want wet-rough. A quote by Jim Nace comes to mind when, in winner's circle he said "If it was just a little bit rougher, it would be perfect". A Van quote, " Theres good ruts and theres bad ruts. When you use the rut to go faster its a good one, but if you hit it wrong and wreck its a bad one". That might not be an exact wording, but, its the way I recall.
Look at your photo again, and realize both those cars have NO POWER STEERING!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests